|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed By
|
Notes
|
|
07/26/2005
|
PETITION-HABEAS CORPUS |
PT David Cook 100018 BY: PT Rachel Day 68535 |
O&7 |
|
07/27/2005
|
No Fee Required |
|
|
|
08/05/2005
|
ORDER-RESPONSE/REPLY REQUESTED |
|
Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent is hereby requested to serve a response to the above-referenced petition on or before October 28, 2005. The petitioner shall have sixty (60) days after service of the response in which to serve the reply to response. |
|
09/06/2005
|
NOTICE-ADDRESS CHANGE |
RS Hon. James V. Crosby, Jr., Etc. CROSBY BY: RS Margarita Ines Cimadevilla 616990 |
|
|
10/26/2005
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE) |
|
SEE SC04-2066 TO VIEW ORDER |
|
10/26/2005
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE) |
RS Hon. James V. Crosby, Jr., Etc. CROSBY BY: RS Margarita Ines Cimadevilla 616990 |
VERBAL REQUEST DUE TO HURRICANE WILMA |
|
11/18/2005
|
RESPONSE |
RS Hon. James V. Crosby, Jr., Etc. CROSBY BY: RS Sandra S. Jaggard 12068 |
O&7 & E-MAIL |
|
01/20/2006
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE |
PT David Cook 100018 BY: PT Paul Edward Kalil 174114 |
O&7 & E-MAIL |
|
02/21/2006
|
ORDER-CASE STYLE CHANGE |
|
The style of the above case has been changed from David Cook vs. James V. Crosby, Jr., etc. to David Cook vs. James R. McDonough, etc. |
|
03/03/2006
|
ORDER-OA SCHED |
|
The above cases are hereby scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, May 2, 2006. A maximum of twenty (20) minutes to the side is allowed, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary. NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP. (TO "VIEW" ORDER SEE SC04-2066) |
|
03/03/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR |
|
|
|
05/02/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD |
|
|
|
03/14/2007
|
DISP-DENIED |
|
David Cook, a prisoner under sentence of death, has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. Cook has alleged that his appellate counsel was ineffective, that omissions in the record precluded a proper direct appeal, and that this Court's harmless error analysis was inadequate. Having found no merit to any of these claims, we hereby deny habeas relief. |
|
06/12/2007
|
ARCHIVES |
|
M/R Box 3035 (file) |
