Home Justices Public Information

Florida Supreme Court Docket

Case Docket

Case Number:  SC05-358  - Closed

MARTIN BAKERMAN  vs.  THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

Lower Tribunal Case(s): 3D03-1465, 3D03-1532


 Date Docketed
Description
Filed By
Notes
03/03/2005 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Robert N. Pelier 998834  
03/04/2005 Filing Fee $300 2005 - 1001526 Amount: $300  
03/04/2005 Fee Paid In Full - $300    
03/11/2005 JURIS INITIAL BRIEF PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 (O&5) WITH APPENDIX AND E-MAIL
04/04/2005 JURIS ANSWER BRIEF RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Robert Erich Biasotti 104272 O&5 & E-FILE
06/07/2005 ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED    
06/27/2005 MOTION-TOLL TIME PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 AMENDED MOTION FILED 07/01/2005
06/27/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 REQ AMENDED MOTION: (AMENDED MOTION FILED 07/01/2005)
07/15/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)   Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including August 4, 2005, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
07/29/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. Mary Cay Blanks, Clerk D3 BY: Hon. Mary Cay Blanks, Clerk D3 1 VOL CC PAPERS, 10 VOLUMES RECORD: (CERTIFICATES OF CLERK FILED 08/01/2005)
08/01/2005 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 O&7 W/APPENDIX & E-MAIL
08/12/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Robert Erich Biasotti 104272  
08/12/2005 MOTION-TOLL TIME RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Robert Erich Biasotti 104272 FILED AS RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED MOTIONTO TOLL THE TIME FOR FILING A BRIEF WHILE THIS COURT CONSIDERS RESPONDENT'S EXTENSION MOTION
08/17/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)   Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including September 23, 2005, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
09/26/2005 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Robert Erich Biasotti 104272 O&7 & E-MAIL
09/29/2005 MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE MR Pacific Legal Foundation BY: MR Valerie A. Fernandez 251021  
09/29/2005 AMICUS CURIAE ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS MR Pacific Legal Foundation BY: MR Valerie A. Fernandez 251021 O&7 & E-MAIL
10/06/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628  
10/06/2005 MOTION-TOLL TIME PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628  
10/07/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)   - EXT TO 11/09/2005, NFE
10/24/2005 ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE GR   The motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae filed by Pacific Legal Foundation is hereby granted and they are allowed to file a brief only in support of Petitioner. The brief by the above referenced amicus curiae was filed with this Court on September 29, 2005.
11/10/2005 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Robert N. Pelier 998834 O&7 & E-MAIL (REQ AMD CERT/SERVICE)
11/21/2005 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD)   PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 0264628 - FOR PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF-MERITS (O&1)
12/16/2005 NOTICE RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Christine R. Davis 569372 OF NAME CHANGE FOR CHRISTINE DEAN
02/23/2006 ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED)   The Court previously accepted jurisdiction and dispensed with oral argument on June 7, 2005. The Court has now determined that oral argument should be granted and the above case is scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Monday, April 3, 2006. A maximum of twenty (20) minutes to the side is allowed, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
02/23/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR    
03/23/2006 NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Christine R. Davis 569372 (O&8)
04/03/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD    
04/06/2006 NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 (O&7)
08/03/2006 NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Robert Erich Biasotti 104272 (O&7) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DOES NOT SERVE ROBERT SCOTT NEWMAN, VALERIE A. FERNANDEZ, OR STEVEN GIESELER.
08/03/2006 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD)   RS The Bombay Company, Inc. BY: RS Christine R. Davis 569372 FOR NOTICE FILED 08/03/06 (O&7)
04/20/2007 NOTICE-ADDRESS CHANGE PT Martin Bakerman BY: PT Barbara Green 264628 FOR BARBARA GREEN (O&7)
06/21/2007 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED   Based on the above, we conclude that the Third District erred in reversing the judgment based solely on the plantiff's failure to demonstrate that the employer concealed a danger. Accordingly, we quash the decision of the Third District in Bombay and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
07/03/2007 MAIL RETURNED   HON. ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., JUDGE - OPINION: 07/05/2007 - RE-MAILED TO CORRECT ADDRESS
07/13/2007 MANDATE   CC: COUNSEL
07/13/2007 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Hon. Mary Cay Blanks, Clerk D3 BY: Hon. Mary Cay Blanks, Clerk D3 10 VOLUMES
08/08/2007 ARCHIVES